Organizations often respond to adverse events and near misses by performing a root cause analysis (RCA). RCA is a systematic method to review an adverse event or near miss to identify the factors that contributed to the event to prevent it from happening again. The RCA process has long been the primary method that organizations use to improve patient safety. Undoubtedly, studying unfavorable outcomes can provide valuable insight into the systemic issues contributing to bad outcomes—but this often comes at a price. By focusing solely on adverse events and unfavorable outcomes, staff morale and motivation can suffer.
But what happens when everything goes right? Or when injury was avoided by an alert staff member who made a “good catch”? Most of the time, healthcare is delivered safely and outcomes are good, but often there is no formal process to research and analyze the factors that contributed to those successful outcomes or good catches.
Success cause analysis (SCA) uses the systematic approach of an RCA to understand the factors that led to a favorable outcome. The goal of the SCA is to learn how success was achieved, reinforce decision-making, and learn how to improve outcomes even further. Focusing on the positive rather than the negative can promote congeniality and enhance team engagement in the organization’s patient safety initiatives.
The traditional view of safety (Safety-1) in critical industries like aviation was that system components either worked correctly or incorrectly. This binary view allowed incident investigators to search for the “cause” of a particular issue and to “fix” the problem.
But modern systems are less binary—they are more complex and involve human interaction and adaptation. When things go right, especially in a fast-paced, rapidly evolving healthcare environment, it is because humans can adapt to the conditions in which they are working.
The new approach to safety (Safety-II) focuses on the ability of a system, including the humans operating within it, to succeed under variable conditions. This approach assumes that the adaptive capacity of humans enhances the flexibility and resilience of their work systems. The Safety-II system requires tools like the SCA to look for and analyze positive outcomes.
Risk Recommendations:
While the RCA remains an important performance improvement tool, the SCA can interject a unique perspective into an organization’s patient safety efforts and improve staff morale and engagement in the process. Consider the following when evaluating whether to introduce an SCA program to your organization:
When adverse events occur, critical event evaluation with an RCA is essential. But when things go well, SCA can help organizations understand the factors that contribute to success, and in doing so, boost morale and staff engagement.
Please note: This article was provided by COVERYS. Embedded hyperlinks may not be accessible in this format. Additional information can be found at COVERYS.com.
We hope you found this RisKey helpful. If you have questions or would like further resources on this topic, please contact your Coverys Risk Management Consultant.
RisKey Emails are a publication of the Coverys Risk Management Department. This information is intended to provide general guidelines for risk management. It is not intended and should not be construed as legal or medical advice. Links are provided as a convenience and for informational purposes only; they are not intended and should not be construed as legal or medical advice. Coverys Risk Management bears no responsibility for the accuracy, legality or content of external sites or for that of subsequent links. Contact external sites for answers to questions regarding content. COPYRIGHTED Medical Professional Mutual Insurance Company • ProSelect® Insurance Company • Preferred Professional Insurance Company